Public Trails Computed from official land records

Scenic Rim · Rosins Lookout

Rosins Lookout from Lilac Tree Court

entry is a road 55 m of climb chain confidence Official spatial — evidence class rosins-lookout--from-lilac-tree-court

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: official spatial record

A lawful approach from Lilac Tree Court, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -28.12343, 153.19582

That is Lilac Tree Court, where the walk below begins — 1.1 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-28.12343, 153.19582

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 714483 nothing mapped 9.7 m 152.9° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 714331 nothing mapped 38.6 m 110.7° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 2777436 nothing mapped 503.1 m 57.1° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1237730 nothing mapped 441.1 m 21.2° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 2777246 Beechmont Road open 66.5 m 30.3° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
Total 57.0 m mapped 1059.0 m Chain confidence Official spatial — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.

Following it on the ground No steps, but the record maps ground here

at least half an hour out and back

at least a quarter of an hour there at least a quarter of an hour back

55 m up and 50 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 50 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

What is mapped along this chain

A managing authority has surveyed a way along 57 m of this 1059 m chain — about 5% of it. That is a statement about what is on the ground, not about your right to be there, which the parcels above already settled, and not a direction: no step below is measured along any of these ways.

  • Leg 5 Beechmont Road Official spatial — evidence class

    57 m along it · the managing authority publishes it as open to the public .

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 985.4 m · height 515.0 to 565.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
55.0 m
Total descent
50.0 m
Steepest sustained
40.8% over 61.3 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
144.2 m 525.0 m
197.2 m 530.0 m
228.8 m 535.0 m
260.0 m 540.0 m
288.9 m 545.0 m
317.3 m 550.0 m
341.2 m 555.0 m
370.4 m 560.0 m
419.0 m 565.0 m
456.3 m 565.0 m
486.9 m 560.0 m
499.8 m 555.0 m
512.9 m 550.0 m
525.0 m 545.0 m
538.0 m 540.0 m
548.2 m 535.0 m
581.1 m 530.0 m
595.9 m 525.0 m
612.2 m 520.0 m
727.9 m 515.0 m
840.3 m 515.0 m
863.9 m 520.0 m
931.4 m 525.0 m
985.4 m 530.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map — covers Scenic Rim

Route map: 5 legs from Lilac Tree Court, 1059.0 m in total.

Panning stops just outside Scenic Rim, because the map archive is published one council area at a time. Every other council area Public Trails covers has a map of its own.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below

    Parcel not resolved, recorded tenure "unresolved". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 714483 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    9.7 m at 152.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 714483 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 714331 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    38.6 m at 110.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 714331 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 2777436 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    503.1 m at 57.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2777436 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1237730 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    441.1 m at 21.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1237730 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 2777246 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    66.5 m at 30.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2777246 Grade official_spatial

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Official spatial — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Rosins Lookout
Lot on plan
not established from the cadastre
Coordinates
-28.11694, 153.20250 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
lookout

What this approach was read from